Wesley B. Lucas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wesley B. Lucas v. State

188 So. 3d 932, 2016 WL 1385892, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 2016

Docket5D15-2051

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 3d 932 (Wesley B. Lucas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wesley B. Lucas v. State, 188 So. 3d 932, 2016 WL 1385892, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wesley B. Lucas, appeals the summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which contains several numbered claims. We conclude that the record conclusively refutes claims two, three, and five. Accordingly, we affirm as to those claims. However, the record attachments do not conclusively refute claims one and four. As to those two claims, we reverse thé order under review and remand this case to the trial court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting those claims or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wesley B. Lucas, appeals the summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which contains several numbered claims. We conclude that the record conclusively refutes claims two, three, and five. Accordingly, we affirm as to those claims. However, the record attachments do not conclusively refute claims one and four. As to those two claims, we reverse thé order under review and remand this case to the trial court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting those claims or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 3d 932, 2016 WL 1385892, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-b-lucas-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.