Wesch v. Common Council

64 N.W. 1051, 1 McGrath 1498, 107 Mich. 149, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1108
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 19, 1895·No. No. 15002·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

To compel the payment of relator’s salary as meat inspector.

The circuit judge denied the application.

Affirmed November 19, 1895, with costs.

The charter empowers the council to appoint a meat inspector, the ordinance provides that such inspector shall receive such annual salary as the council may determine, and the charter provides that the compensation of no officer shall be diminished during the term for which he was elected or appointed.

Helator’s term commenced July 1, 1894, but after his appointment and before his term commenced the council reduced the compensation below that paid for the preceding year.

Held, that relator’s appointment and acceptance were subject not only to the right of the council but to its duty as well to fix the salary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wesch v. Common Council, 64 N.W. 1051, 1 McGrath 1498, 107 Mich. 149, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1108 (Mich. 1895).

64 N.W. 1051 (Wesch v. Common Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2005
Dearborn City Council v. Mayor of Dearborn
387 N.W.2d 633 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)
Schanke v. Mendon
93 N.W.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1958)
State ex rel. Thurmond v. City of Shreveport
50 So. 3 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)