Wesbert v. State

782 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5180, 2001 WL 388026
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 782 So. 2d 545 (Wesbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wesbert v. State, 782 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5180, 2001 WL 388026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking defendant’s probation. However, as the State acknowledges, the trial court’s written Order of Probation Violation does not conform to the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge at the time that the probation was revoked. Accordingly, while we affirm the revocation of probation, we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter an Order of Revocation that conforms to the' trial judge’s oral pronouncements. See Suarez v. State, 761 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benitez v. State
57 So. 3d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5180, 2001 WL 388026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesbert-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.