Wery v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry.
This text of 112 A. 117 (Wery v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts which the jury must have found under the testimony in this case are concisely and clearly stated in the opinion of the learned court below denying the motion for a new trial, and, in view of them, a verdict was properly directed for the defendant. No one of the first six assignments, which allege errors in rulings on offers of evidence, calls for a retrial of the case, and they, with the seventh and eighth, complaining of the direction of a verdict for the defendant, are overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A. 117, 268 Pa. 381, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wery-v-buffalo-rochester-pittsburgh-ry-pa-1920.