Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.
9 A. 331, 6 Sadler 361
Opinion
It may be conceded that the line is not sharply defined between the cases which hold that a chattel held under a bailment and conditional sale will be liable to execution as the property of the bailee and the other cases which declare that the property of the vendor shall not be so liable. We think, however, this case was correctly decided under the authority of Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26; therefore,
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co., 9 A. 331, 6 Sadler 361 (Pa. 1887).
9 A. 331 (Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. Minon
104 F.2d 765 (Third Circuit, 1939)
Redewill v. Gillen
4 N.M. 78 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1887)