Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.

9 A. 331, 6 Sadler 361

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 2, 1887

DocketNo. 175, E. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A. 331 (Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co., 9 A. 331, 6 Sadler 361 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It may be conceded that the line is not sharply defined between the cases which hold that a chattel held under a bailment and conditional sale will be liable to execution as the property of the bailee and the other cases which declare that the property of the vendor shall not be so liable. We think, however, this case was correctly decided under the authority of Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26; therefore,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It may be conceded that the line is not sharply defined between the cases which hold that a chattel held under a bailment and conditional sale will be liable to execution as the property of the bailee and the other cases which declare that the property of the vendor shall not be so liable. We think, however, this case was correctly decided under the authority of Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26; therefore,

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A. 331, 6 Sadler 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wertz-v-h-w-collender-co-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack