Wertheimer v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Wertheimer v. United States

71 F. 949, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1896

DocketNo. 1,727

StatusPublished

This text of 71 F. 949 (Wertheimer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wertheimer v. United States, 71 F. 949, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

The question here is whether these are “men’s,” or “ladies and children’s,” gloves, under paragraph 458 of the tariff act of 1890. There is no distinction between boys’ and girls’ gloves, but all not men’s are classed with ladies’ and children’s. Much testimony has been taken in this court that was no/ before the appraisers. Upon all the evidence, these seem not to be men’s gloves, but ladies’ or children’s. They should therefore be classified as such. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

The question here is whether these are “men’s,” or “ladies and children’s,” gloves, under paragraph 458 of the tariff act of 1890. There is no distinction between boys’ and girls’ gloves, but all not men’s are classed with ladies’ and children’s. Much testimony has been taken in this court that was no/ before the appraisers. Upon all the evidence, these seem not to be men’s gloves, but ladies’ or children’s. They should therefore be classified as such. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F. 949, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wertheimer-v-united-states-circtsdny-1896.