Wertheimer v. Ridgeway

47 So. 569, 157 Ala. 398, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 167
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 12, 1908·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

— The appeal in this case is taken from an order of the circuit judge, made in vacation, denying the petition of appellant, asking for a rehearing, [399]*399under section 3342 of the Code of 1896. The case is here submitted primarily on motion to' dismiss the appeal. This motion must prevail.

The judgment appealed from is unauthorized, and consequently a nullity. The judgment was rendered, not by any court, but by the judge in vacation. The statute (section 3346) provides that such petition, as in this case, must be tried by the court. — Ex parte Farquhar & Son, 99 Ala. 375, 11 South. 913. The judgment being a nullity, will not support an appeal. —Adams v. Wright, 129 Ala. 305, 30 South. 574. The cases cited by appellant were appeals from judgments of the court, and therefore do not apply here.

The appeal is dismissed.

Tyson, C. J., and Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wertheimer v. Ridgeway, 47 So. 569, 157 Ala. 398, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 167 (Ala. 1908).

47 So. 569 (Wertheimer v. Ridgeway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.
138 So. 287 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Cornelius v. Lowery
70 So. 305 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Hayes v. Hayes
68 So. 351 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Durst v. Haenni
23 Colo. App. 431 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1913)