Wertheimer v. Independent Order Free Sons of Judah

50 N.Y.S. 842
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 N.Y.S. 842 (Wertheimer v. Independent Order Free Sons of Judah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wertheimer v. Independent Order Free Sons of Judah, 50 N.Y.S. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

The defendant is a fraternal order, and one Edward Wertheimer was a member at the time of his death. The constitution of the defendant provides that upon the death of a member a sum of $500 shall be paid to the widow of the deceased member, but that the member may, by a designation in the manner and form prescribed by the constitution, bequeath the sum of $250 of his death benefit to his children. The deceased died, leaving a widow and no children. He also left a will, which has been duly admitted to probate, by which he bequeathed $250 of his death benefit to his sister, Annie Blee. The plaintiff, the widow of the deceased, having brought this action to recover $500, the amount of Edward Wertheimer’s death benefit, a motion for interpleader was made upon the ground that the said Annie Blee claimed $250 of this fund. This motion was denied, and from the order thereupon entered this appeal is taken.

In order that a motion for interpleader should be granted, it must be made to appear that the defendant runs some risk or hazard in paying the amount claimed by the plaintiff. In the case at bar no such risk or hazard is made to appear. The provisions of the defendant’s constitution preclude any one but the widow from participating in the death benefit, unless there are children to whom the assured may bequeath not over half of the amount of the policy. The deceased having left no children, the widow is absolutely entitled to the whole of the death benefit, and the claim attempted to be instituted by Annie Blee is clearly without any foundation.

The order was therefore rightfully denied, and should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sexton v. Home Fire Insurance
54 N.Y.S. 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 N.Y.S. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wertheimer-v-independent-order-free-sons-of-judah-nyappdiv-1898.