Werter v. Samsky
This text of 268 A.D. 913 (Werter v. Samsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by plaintiff Ida Werter to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained as the result of a fall which occurred when she lost her balance by reason of the moving wademeath her foot of a loose door saddle, eoastituting part of premises which [914]*914had been leased by defendant, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and damages for loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts do not warrant a departure from the doctrine enunciated in Cullings v. Goetz (256 N. Y. 287). Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 913, 51 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werter-v-samsky-nyappdiv-1944.