Werter v. Samsky
Opinion
Action by plaintiff Ida Werter to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained as the result of a fall which occurred when she lost her balance by reason of the moving wademeath her foot of a loose door saddle, eoastituting part of premises which [914] had been leased by defendant, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and damages for loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts do not warrant a departure from the doctrine enunciated in Cullings v. Goetz (256 N. Y. 287). Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
268 A.D. 913 (Werter v. Samsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.