Werter v. Samsky

268 A.D. 913, 51 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4230
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action by plaintiff Ida Werter to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained as the result of a fall which occurred when she lost her balance by reason of the moving wademeath her foot of a loose door saddle, eoastituting part of premises which [914] had been leased by defendant, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and damages for loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts do not warrant a departure from the doctrine enunciated in Cullings v. Goetz (256 N. Y. 287). Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Werter v. Samsky, 268 A.D. 913, 51 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 913 (Werter v. Samsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.
270 A.D. 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)