Wert v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided November 12, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-00477·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Heather A. Wert,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:17cv477

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on October 26, 2020 (Doc. 45). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 45) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 45) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 40) under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), is GRANTED and counsel is AWARDED attorney fees in the amount of $10,536.57.1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

1 As noted by the Magistrate Judge, counsel has acknowledged that any award of fees under § 406(b) must be offset by the previous award of Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) fees (see Doc. 31) in the amount of $2,422.50. Thus, if paid to counsel, the $2,422.50 EAJA fee must be refunded to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wert v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Wert v. Commissioner of Social Security (Wert v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related