Werner v. Shilare
This text of 237 A.D. 811 (Werner v. Shilare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; Merrell, J., dissents on the ground that the directed verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence, that the testimony of the plaintiff’s witness Klein was clear and reasonable and was unshaken upon cross-examination, whereas the testimony of the defendants’ witness Hollander was evasive and, in several instances, as to material matters, contained contradictions of the testimony which he had given in his examination before trial, and, therefore, he was unworthy of belief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werner-v-shilare-nyappdiv-1932.