Werner v. Pen Argyl Imp. Co.

19 A. 417, 133 Pa. 457, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 920
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County
DecidedMarch 24, 1890
DocketNo. 471
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A. 417 (Werner v. Pen Argyl Imp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Werner v. Pen Argyl Imp. Co., 19 A. 417, 133 Pa. 457, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 920 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

Per. Curiam:

We are unable to see the necessity of twenty-seven assignments of error in this case. There was one question of fact, viz., was the property outside the borough limits ? and, if so, there was the further question of law, whether the parties by their agreement had liquidated the damages b3r the amount of the note. The jury have found the question of fact in favor of the plaintiff below, and we think the court ruled the question of law correctly. We notice nothing in the other assignments which requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kleiman Et Ux. v. Cohen
98 Pa. Super. 61 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A. 417, 133 Pa. 457, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werner-v-pen-argyl-imp-co-pactcomplnortha-1890.