Werner v. Jackson

115 A.D. 176, 100 N.Y.S. 763, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3652
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order of Special Term canceling a lis pendens upon giving security. The judgment demanded by the complaint was that the defendant Simon P. Flannery be decreed to specifically perform a contract for the conveyance of real estate in the city, of New York, and that in the alternative the plaintiff be decreed or adjudged to have a lien for the amount dejiosited upon the execution of the contract.

It has been determined in this department that the right of-the plaintiff to retain the notice of pendency of action in an action for a decree for specific performance of the contract for a conveyance of real property must be determined upon the allegations of the complaint, or facts clearly established, and that upon such a motion as in the case at bar we are not authorized to look into the facts as upon a trial, nor 'to search the complaint as upon a demurrer. (Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Lindheim & Co. v. Central Nat. Realty & Construction Co., Id. 275; Wolinsky v. Okun, Id. 536; McCrum v. Lex Realty Co., 113 id. 58.)

[177] Upon those authorities the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Order filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Werner v. Jackson, 115 A.D. 176, 100 N.Y.S. 763, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

115 A.D. 176 (Werner v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunshine v. Ainspan
39 Misc. 2d 292 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)