Werner-Leible v. Le Lu Metalcraft

Missouri Court of Appeals

Werner-Leible v. Le Lu Metalcraft

249 S.W.3d 921, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 513, 2008 WL 1722734

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 2008·No. ED 90183·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Second Injury Fund appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding the claimant, Ms. Werner-Leible, permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of her work injury and pre-existing disabilities, thereby triggering Second Injury Fund liability. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission’s award. Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Second Injury Fund appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding the claimant, Ms. Werner-Leible, permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of her work injury and pre-existing disabilities, thereby triggering Second Injury Fund liability. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission’s award. Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Werner-Leible v. Le Lu Metalcraft, 249 S.W.3d 921, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 513, 2008 WL 1722734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

249 S.W.3d 921 (Werner-Leible v. Le Lu Metalcraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related