Werner, Harris & Buck v. Equitable Trust Co.

33 F.2d 1023, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2868
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1929·No. No. 50·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground of absence of necessary parties appellee is overruled without prejudice on authority of Lockman v. Lang (C. C. A. 8) 132 F. 1, 3-5; Gray v. Grand Forks Mercantile Co. (C. C. A. 8), 138 F. 344, 346; and on the ground of the lack of capacity of the appellant to prosecute the appeal is overruled with prejudice on the authority of International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U. S. 215, 233, 39 S. Ct. 68, 63 L. Ed. 211, 2 A. L. R. 293.

Let an order be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Werner, Harris & Buck v. Equitable Trust Co., 33 F.2d 1023, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2868 (10th Cir. 1929).

33 F.2d 1023 (Werner, Harris & Buck v. Equitable Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Mulber Oil Co.
38 F.2d 396 (Tenth Circuit, 1930)