Werle v. Stockinger
233 A.D. 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 233 A.D. 886 (Werle v. Stockinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Werle v. Stockinger, 233 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill and Rhodes, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal, on the law, and a new trial on the ground that the trial court erroneously excluded the admissions contained in a letter written by defendant’s agent Lyons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werle-v-stockinger-nyappdiv-1931.