Werk v. Lorain Street Savings & Trust Co.

299 U.S. 512, 57 S. Ct. 107
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 26, 1936
DocketNo. 33
StatusPublished

This text of 299 U.S. 512 (Werk v. Lorain Street Savings & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Werk v. Lorain Street Savings & Trust Co., 299 U.S. 512, 57 S. Ct. 107 (1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question as to the validity of a statute of the State. (1) Crowell v. Randell, 10 Pet. 368, 392; Railroad Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177, 180; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360. (2) Doty v. Love, 295 U. S. 64. In so far as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Supreme Court of Ohio upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the [513]*513Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.

Mr. Orlin F. Goudy, with whom Mr. Louis W. Gering, Jr., was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. James B. Garfield, Arthur D. Baldwin, John W. Bricker, Attorney General of Ohio, and J. Roth Crabbe, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Railroad Company v. Rock
71 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1867)
Whitney v. California
274 U.S. 357 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Doty v. Love
295 U.S. 64 (Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 U.S. 512, 57 S. Ct. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werk-v-lorain-street-savings-trust-co-scotus-1936.