Werger v. Haines Corp.
This text of 277 A.D.2d 1108 (Werger v. Haines Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 16, 1950, in New York County, as granted a motion by plaintiffs for an order striking out the answer of appellants and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Taking the facts set forth in the answering affidavit as distinguished from the conclusions contained therein, it would seem that the order awarding summary judgment to plaintiffs was proper (Jenkins v. Moyse, 254 N. Y. 319).
The order granting plaintiffs’ motion under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs- ' respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werger-v-haines-corp-nyappdiv-1950.