Werger v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Werger v. City of New York

283 A.D.2d 325, 724 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 325 (Werger v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Werger v. City of New York, 283 A.D.2d 325, 724 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered November 12, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendant City of New York’s cross motion for summary judgment, severing and dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action against defendant City as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s complaint as against defendant City was properly dismissed in light of her failure to file her summons and complaint within the one-year-and-ninety-day limitations period imposed by General Municipal Law § 50-i (1) (c) (see, Burrell v Countrytowne Apt. Partnership, 247 AD2d 805; see also, Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners’ Assn. v T & D Constr. Corp., 181 AD2d 871, 872). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered November 12, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendant City of New York’s cross motion for summary judgment, severing and dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action against defendant City as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s complaint as against defendant City was properly dismissed in light of her failure to file her summons and complaint within the one-year-and-ninety-day limitations period imposed by General Municipal Law § 50-i (1) (c) (see, Burrell v Countrytowne Apt. Partnership, 247 AD2d 805; see also, Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners’ Assn. v T & D Constr. Corp., 181 AD2d 871, 872). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 325, 724 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werger-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack