Werfel v. Agresta
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination' fixing the compensation to be paid to petitioner for his fee for legal services rendered as assigned counsel for a defendant in a criminal action under Indictment No. 1716-73 in the Supreme Court, Queens County, [611] and to compel respondent to approve payment of $500 for petitioner’s services. Motion by respondent in said proceeding to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the petition fails to state facts entitling petitioner to the relief sought. Respondent’s motion granted and petition dismissed, without costs. The court is without power to entertain this proceeding (Matter of Fisher v. Schenek, 39 A D 2d 813). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
44 A.D.2d 610 (Werfel v. Agresta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.