Werfel v. Agresta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Werfel v. Agresta

44 A.D.2d 610, 354 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 610 (Werfel v. Agresta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Werfel v. Agresta, 44 A.D.2d 610, 354 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination' fixing the compensation to be paid to petitioner for his fee for legal services rendered as assigned counsel for a defendant in a criminal action under Indictment No. 1716-73 in the Supreme Court, Queens County, [611]*611and to compel respondent to approve payment of $500 for petitioner’s services. Motion by respondent in said proceeding to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the petition fails to state facts entitling petitioner to the relief sought. Respondent’s motion granted and petition dismissed, without costs. The court is without power to entertain this proceeding (Matter of Fisher v. Schenek, 39 A D 2d 813). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination' fixing the compensation to be paid to petitioner for his fee for legal services rendered as assigned counsel for a defendant in a criminal action under Indictment No. 1716-73 in the Supreme Court, Queens County, [611]*611and to compel respondent to approve payment of $500 for petitioner’s services. Motion by respondent in said proceeding to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the petition fails to state facts entitling petitioner to the relief sought. Respondent’s motion granted and petition dismissed, without costs. The court is without power to entertain this proceeding (Matter of Fisher v. Schenek, 39 A D 2d 813). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 610, 354 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/werfel-v-agresta-nyappdiv-1974.