Werder v. Continental Can Co.

Sixth Circuit

Werder v. Continental Can Co.

108 F.2d 1022, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 719, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 1939

DocketNo. 7933

StatusPublished

This text of 108 F.2d 1022 (Werder v. Continental Can Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Werder v. Continental Can Co., 108 F.2d 1022, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 719, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661 (6th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a suit by the appellants for infringement of two patents, the first to John F. Werder, No. 1,762,903 for a self-dispensing liquid package, and the second, a method patent likewise to Werder, No. 1,788,261, the court below held claim No. 10, the single claim of the first patent invalid, and claims 3, 8 and 12 of the second patent, not infringed, and dismissed the bill, and

Upon consideration of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, it appears to us that the case was correctly decided, and

The District Judge having announced a memorandum opinion, 30 F.Supp. 534, incorporating therein adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law and reasoning which commends itself to us as sufficient in form and content to sustain the conclusion by him reached to which little, if anything, need be added:

It is hereby ordered that the decree dismissing the bill of the appellants be and it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI