Weppler v. Weppler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weppler v. Weppler

111 A. 159, 91 N.J. Eq. 535, 6 Stock. 535, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 310

DecidedJune 14, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A. 159 (Weppler v. Weppler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weppler v. Weppler, 111 A. 159, 91 N.J. Eq. 535, 6 Stock. 535, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 310 (N.J. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We arc -satisfied that the defendant abandoned his wife and neglected to maintain and provide for her, leaving it to their children to take care of her. Upon the marriage of the last child, and his departure' from the father’s farm, the petitioner was justified, under the circumstances, in going with him, and appealing to the court-of chancery under section 26 of the Divorce act. Comp. Stat. p. 2038. The amount of alimony fixed by the vice-chancellor is justified- by the evidence as to the husband’s means. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Sivayze, Trenciiaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscii, Black, White, ITeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackeéson — It.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We arc -satisfied that the defendant abandoned his wife and neglected to maintain and provide for her, leaving it to their children to take care of her. Upon the marriage of the last child, and his departure' from the father’s farm, the petitioner was justified, under the circumstances, in going with him, and appealing to the court-of chancery under section 26 of the Divorce act. Comp. Stat. p. 2038. The amount of alimony fixed by the vice-chancellor is justified- by the evidence as to the husband’s means. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Sivayze, Trenciiaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscii, Black, White, ITeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackeéson — It.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A. 159, 91 N.J. Eq. 535, 6 Stock. 535, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weppler-v-weppler-nj-1920.