Wenzler v. Williams
This text of 17 A.D.3d 452 (Wenzler v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a down payment in connection with a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants John Williams and Catherine Williams appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated April 16, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover a down payment made in connection with a contract for the sale of real property. In opposition to her prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendants [453]*453John Williams and Catherine Williams failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the plaintiff forfeited the down payment by violating certain terms of the contract concerning the procurement of a mortgage commitment (see Severini v Wallace, 13 AD3d 434 [2004]). Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 A.D.3d 452, 792 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wenzler-v-williams-nyappdiv-2005.