Wenzke v. State
This text of Wenzke v. State (Wenzke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ADAM WENZKE, § § Defendant Below, § No. 20, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 140502464 (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 2, 2018 Decided: April 4, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
This 4th day of April 2018, after careful consideration of the opening brief, the
motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the judgment below should
be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned order dated December
11, 2017. The Superior Court did not err in summarily dismissing the appellant’s
first motion for post-conviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. The
motion was procedurally barred under Rule 61(i)(1) and failed to allege any
exception to the application of the procedural bars under Rule 61(i)(5). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wenzke v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wenzke-v-state-del-2018.