Wenzell v. Morrisey

New York Court of Appeals

Wenzell v. Morrisey

2 Silv. Ct. App. 405, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 492

DecidedOctober 8, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Silv. Ct. App. 405 (Wenzell v. Morrisey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wenzell v. Morrisey, 2 Silv. Ct. App. 405, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 492 (N.Y. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, J.

The courts below have sustained the attachment.

Rules for the guidance of the discretion of a court or judge in granting an attachment, and upon which the general term act in reviewing such discretion, have been announced in many cases. Here the only question is one of jurisdiction. If the affidavits upon which the attachment issued showed the existence of the statutory conditions, it is an end of the appeal. We think they did show a cause of action on contract on money loaned and goods sold to the amount of $5,746. Some of the facts are imperfectly stated- and some are left to inference, but the facts to be inferred are the sequence of the facts directly stated. The opinion of the general term is full upon the questions debated and elaboration here is unnecessary.

Order affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, J.

The courts below have sustained the attachment.

Rules for the guidance of the discretion of a court or judge in granting an attachment, and upon which the general term act in reviewing such discretion, have been announced in many cases. Here the only question is one of jurisdiction. If the affidavits upon which the attachment issued showed the existence of the statutory conditions, it is an end of the appeal. We think they did show a cause of action on contract on money loaned and goods sold to the amount of $5,746. Some of the facts are imperfectly stated- and some are left to inference, but the facts to be inferred are the sequence of the facts directly stated. The opinion of the general term is full upon the questions debated and elaboration here is unnecessary.

Order affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Silv. Ct. App. 405, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wenzell-v-morrisey-ny-1889.