Wentzel v. Hubbell
This text of 245 A.D. 753 (Wentzel v. Hubbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order denying motion for an injunction pendente lite restraining the award of a contract for X-ray equipment to other than the lowest bidder. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Standard X-Ray Co. v. Hubbell [ante, p. 751], decided herewith.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, CarsweH and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wentzel-v-hubbell-nyappdiv-1935.