Wentworth v. Jefferson

60 N.H. 158
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bingham, J.

Whether the case should have been taken from the jury on account of the offer made by counsel, was a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Zollar v. Janvrin, 47 N. H. 324. Although the plaintiff violated the law by travelling on Sunday, she might recover if the illegality of the act did not contribute to the accident. Corey v. Bath, 35 N. H. 530, 541; Sutton v. Wauwatosa, 29 Wis. 21; Sewell v. Webster, 59 N. H. 586.

Judgment on the verdict.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N.H. 158 (N.H. 1880).

60 N.H. 158 (Wentworth v. Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Merriman
111 A. 751 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)
Caher v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
71 A. 225 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1908)
Merrill v. Perkins
61 N.H. 262 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)