Wentworth v. Barnum
10 Johns. 238
This text of 10 Johns. 238 (Wentworth v. Barnum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wentworth v. Barnum, 10 Johns. 238 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).
Opinion
The plaintiff; by his replication, admitted the truth of the plea of a prior suit commenced against him by the defendant, which, according to the settled construction of the sta~ tute, is a good and sufficient bar to the action; and whether such suit be by warrant or summons, can make no difference. (1 Johns. Rep. 283.) The judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Donville v. Russell
1 How. N.P. 8 (Circuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Johns. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wentworth-v-barnum-nysupct-1813.