Wensley v. Randolph

30 N.Y.S. 239, 9 Misc. 457, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 131
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedAugust 1, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 30 N.Y.S. 239 (Wensley v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wensley v. Randolph, 30 N.Y.S. 239, 9 Misc. 457, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 131 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The power of this court to entertain appeals from district courts is purely statutory. No authority for entertaining an appeal from an interlocutory order has been brought to our attention. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from judgments, and final orders in summary proceedings. See Jacobs v. Zeltner (handed down herewith) 30 N. Y. Supp. 238. This appeal must therefore be dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pascocello v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
26 Misc. 412 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Feist v. Third Ave. Railroad
34 N.Y.S. 57 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Nicholson v. Moriarty
34 N.Y.S. 57 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Zimmermann v. Bloch
32 N.Y.S. 1073 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 N.Y.S. 239, 9 Misc. 457, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wensley-v-randolph-nyctcompl-1894.