Wensink v. Kurtz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wensink v. Kurtz

172 So. 2d 16

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 1965

DocketNo. 64-698

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 16 (Wensink v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wensink v. Kurtz, 172 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the review of the record on appeal in this cause and the briefs of the respective parties, it appears that the order here under review should be reversed and remanded to the trial judge for further consideration, as both counsel concede that the trial court was not properly advised of the effective dates of statutes which were applicable to the issue before the court

Therefore, in view of the appellee having confessed error, the order here under review is hereby reversed and the cause remanded to the trial judge for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Following the review of the record on appeal in this cause and the briefs of the respective parties, it appears that the order here under review should be reversed and remanded to the trial judge for further consideration, as both counsel concede that the trial court was not properly advised of the effective dates of statutes which were applicable to the issue before the court

Therefore, in view of the appellee having confessed error, the order here under review is hereby reversed and the cause remanded to the trial judge for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wensink-v-kurtz-fladistctapp-1965.