Wennett v. Ross
This text of 439 Mass. 1003 (Wennett v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We allowed the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. The plaintiffs seek to reform the Richard B. Ross 1996 Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust to correct two alleged scrivener’s errors in paragraph 8A of the trust. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to strike the phrase “[djuring the lifetime of the Grantor” and replace the reference to “RICHARD B. ROSS” with “JUDI A. ROSS.” The trust beneficiaries have all assented to the relief requested.4
After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trust fails to conform to the settlor’s intent because of scrivener’s error. Walker v. Walker, 433 Mass. 581, 587 (2001). Thus, the proposed reforms should be allowed as a matter of Massachusetts law.
A judgment shall be entered in the Probate and Family Court reforming the Richard B. Ross 1996 Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust in the manner set forth in paragraph 27 of the plaintiffs’ complaint. The reformation is to be effective as of the date the trust instrument was executed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 Mass. 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wennett-v-ross-mass-2003.