Wennett v. Ross

439 Mass. 1003
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 4, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 439 Mass. 1003 (Wennett v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wennett v. Ross, 439 Mass. 1003 (Mass. 2003).

Opinion

We allowed the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. The plaintiffs seek to reform the Richard B. Ross 1996 Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust to correct two alleged scrivener’s errors in paragraph 8A of the trust. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to strike the phrase “[djuring the lifetime of the Grantor” and replace the reference to “RICHARD B. ROSS” with “JUDI A. ROSS.” The trust beneficiaries have all assented to the relief requested.4

After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trust fails to conform to the settlor’s intent because of scrivener’s error. Walker v. Walker, 433 Mass. 581, 587 (2001). Thus, the proposed reforms should be allowed as a matter of Massachusetts law.

Raymond H. Young, Martin M. Fantozzi, & Pamela L. Signorello, for the plaintiffs, submitted a brief.

A judgment shall be entered in the Probate and Family Court reforming the Richard B. Ross 1996 Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust in the manner set forth in paragraph 27 of the plaintiffs’ complaint. The reformation is to be effective as of the date the trust instrument was executed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Walker
433 Mass. 581 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 Mass. 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wennett-v-ross-mass-2003.