Wennerstein v. Pectol
This text of Wennerstein v. Pectol (Wennerstein v. Pectol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
JAMES E. WHITNEY WENNERSTEIN ADC #163817 PLAINTIFF
v. No. 4:25-cv-744-DPM
STACEY PECTOL, Criminal Justice Coordinator, Supreme Court of Arkansas; KAREN BAKER, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; and COURTNEY HUDSON, RHONDA WOOD, SHAWN WOMACK, BARBARA WOOD, CODY HILAND, and NICHOLAS BRONNI, Associate Justices, Arkansas Supreme Court DEFENDANTS
ORDER The Court stands by its ruling that Wennerstein is a three-striker. Gonzalez v. United States, 23 F.4th 788, 789-91 (8th Cir. 2022). He failed to state a claim in Whitney v. Trump, No. 5:17-cv-199-JLH (E.D. Ark.), Doc. 5. He also failed to state a claim in Whitney v. Glover, No. 5:17-cv-327-JLH (E.D. Ark.), Doc. 4. And his complaint was dismissed as frivolous in Wennerstein v. Kelley, 5:19-cv-154-BRW, Doc. 25 & 26. All these are strikes. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Wennerstein’s motion to reopen his case, Doc. 8, is denied. So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 10 September 2025
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wennerstein v. Pectol, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wennerstein-v-pectol-ared-2025.