Wenner v. Foster

336 So. 2d 1248
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1976
DocketNo. 76-663
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 336 So. 2d 1248 (Wenner v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wenner v. Foster, 336 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and brief of the appellant, appellee having failed to furnish the court with a brief, we determine that the trial court erred by going outside the four corners of the complaint in determining and granting dismissal of the third party second amended complaint with prejudice in favor of Foster. Tiseo v. Arnold, 237 So.2d 21 (Fla.App.1970).

Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Facchina v. Mutual Benefits Corp.
735 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Sovran Bank, NA v. Parsons
547 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Eugene v. Prestcon, Inc.
528 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 So. 2d 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wenner-v-foster-fladistctapp-1976.