wenn K v. SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC.

S.D. New York

wenn K v. SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 5, 2025·No. 1:22-cv-07462·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 7462 (JHR) -against- JUDGMENT For Attorney’s Fees and Costs SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC., Defendant. wenn K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 4, 2025, that Sonder's Motion for Fees and Costs is GRANTED IN PART; ORDERED, that Sonder is entitled to recover the fees and costs it incurred in defending this matter; and it 1s further ORDERED, that Rose Leaf shall pay the sum of $266,817.96, which represents the costs ($6,049.46) and attorney's fees ($260,768.50) that Sonder incurred in defending this case. Defendant is not entitled to preyudgment interest on attorneys’ fees and costs. "In a diversity case such as this one, state law governs the award of prejudgment interest." Koziar v. Blammo, Ltd., 759 F. Supp. 3d 543, 554 (S.D.N.Y. 2024) (citing Schipani v. McLeod, 541 F.3d 158, 164-65 (2d Cir. 2008)). Dated: New York, New York September 5, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG ClerkofCourt

BY: Cr DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 7462 (JHR) -against- JUDGMENT For Attorney’s Fees and Costs SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC., Defendant. wenn K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 4, 2025, that Sonder's Motion for Fees and Costs is GRANTED IN PART; ORDERED, that Sonder is entitled to recover the fees and costs it incurred in defending this matter; and it 1s further ORDERED, that Rose Leaf shall pay the sum of $266,817.96, which represents the costs ($6,049.46) and attorney's fees ($260,768.50) that Sonder incurred in defending this case. Defendant is not entitled to preyudgment interest on attorneys’ fees and costs. "In a diversity case such as this one, state law governs the award of prejudgment interest." Koziar v. Blammo, Ltd., 759 F. Supp. 3d 543, 554 (S.D.N.Y. 2024) (citing Schipani v. McLeod, 541 F.3d 158, 164-65 (2d Cir. 2008)). Dated: New York, New York September 5, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG ClerkofCourt

BY: Cr DeputyClerk

wenn K v. SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

wenn K v. SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC. (wenn K v. SONDER HOSPITALITY USA, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related