Wenmoth v. Duncan

358 F. App'x 399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wenmoth v. Duncan. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 F. App'x 271
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. Nos. 09-7750, 09-7826·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Andrew Wenmoth seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint in part and denying his motion to alter or amend the district’s order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wenmoth seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Wenmoth’s motions for stays pending appeal and dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wenmoth v. Duncan, 358 F. App'x 399 (4th Cir. 2009).

358 F. App'x 399 (Wenmoth v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)