Wenger v. Wenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wenger v. Wenger

73 A.D.2d 649, 422 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 649 (Wenger v. Wenger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wenger v. Wenger, 73 A.D.2d 649, 422 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to hold Louis Wenger in contempt of court for his willful failure to make support payments, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 24, 1978, which, inter alia, granted Louis Wenger a setoff of $18,105 against arrearages. Louis Wenger has withdrawn his appeal. On the cross appeal by Ann Wenger, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The record amply supports the determination of the Family Court that petitioner consented to the manner in which Louis Wenger met his support obligations. A setoff against arrearages was therefore proper. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, to hold Louis Wenger in contempt of court for his willful failure to make support payments, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 24, 1978, which, inter alia, granted Louis Wenger a setoff of $18,105 against arrearages. Louis Wenger has withdrawn his appeal. On the cross appeal by Ann Wenger, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The record amply supports the determination of the Family Court that petitioner consented to the manner in which Louis Wenger met his support obligations. A setoff against arrearages was therefore proper. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 649, 422 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wenger-v-wenger-nyappdiv-1979.