Wenger v. Mollin
191 N.E. 611, 264 N.Y. 656, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1688
Opinion
Judgments modified by granting a new trial, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the case presented an issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. No opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wenger v. Mollin, 191 N.E. 611, 264 N.Y. 656, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1688 (N.Y. 1934).
191 N.E. 611 (Wenger v. Mollin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martello v. United States
172 F. Supp. 3d 332 (D. Massachusetts, 2016)
Berk v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center
380 F. Supp. 2d 334 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Kenneth E. Sitts v. United States
811 F.2d 736 (Second Circuit, 1987)