Wenger v. Lefrak
279 A.D. 993, 111 N.Y.S.2d 872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1952·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
We think that the disposition made of this matter in the decision of the court at Trial Term is correct. It is appropriate, however, to add that there is no evidence nor is it contended that defendants-respondents were guilty of bad faith toward the broker in the procurement of the broker’s agreement that no commission should become payable unless title were actually transferred. Only the question of the brokerage commissions is involved herein.
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wenger v. Lefrak, 279 A.D. 993, 111 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 993 (Wenger v. Lefrak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kraham Leasing Corp. v. Kent Arms Co.
48 A.D.2d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Benenson Management Co. v. Banner Holding Corp.
13 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Reiner v. Ellinger
29 Misc. 2d 138 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Douglas L. Elliman & Co. v. Lantzounis
30 Misc. 2d 550 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)