Wenfang Liu v. Timothy Mund

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wenfang Liu v. Timothy Mund. Read the opinion of the Court — 686 F.3d 418
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 27, 2012·No. 11-1453·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 27, 2012

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 11‐1453

WENFANG LIU, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff‐Appellant, District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. v. No. 3:09‐cv‐00500‐wmc TIMOTHY MUND, Defendant‐Appellee. William M. Conley, Chief Judge

O R D E R

In response to the motion by the Department of Justice filed on July 26, 2012, p. 10 of the slip opinion in this case is amended to delete the following language: ʺAnother objection is the proposal’s lack of authoritative sponsorship. The government’s amicus curiae brief is signed only by Justice Department lawyers. There is no indication of consultation with the Department of Homeland Security, the frontline enforcer of the nation’s immigration laws.ʺ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wenfang Liu v. Timothy Mund, (7th Cir. 2012).

Wenfang Liu v. Timothy Mund (Wenfang Liu v. Timothy Mund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.