Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage. Read the opinion of the Court — 836 F.3d 1117
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 8, 2016·No. 14-15027·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 08 2016 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

WENDY J. PAULUK, Psy.D, individually No. 14-15027 and as personal representative of the proposed Estate of Daniel Pauluk; JAIME D.C. No. L. PAULUK; CHRISSY J. PAULUK, 2:07-cv-01681-PMP-VCF District of Nevada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Las Vegas

v. ORDER GLENN SAVAGE, an individual; EDWARD WOJCIK, an individual,

Defendants-Appellants.

Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

This court’s Memorandum Disposition filed February 29, 2016, and reported

at 641 Fed. Appx. 756, is withdrawn, and is replaced by the attached Opinion and

Dissents. With the filing of the new Opinion, the panel has voted to deny the

petition for rehearing en banc.

Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may

be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage, (9th Cir. 2016).

Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage (Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage
641 F. App'x 756 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)