Wendover v. Ball

New York Supreme Court

Wendover v. Ball

1 Cole. Cas. 44

DecidedJuly 15, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. Cas. 44 (Wendover v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wendover v. Ball, 1 Cole. Cas. 44 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice of inserting only one real person in bail pieces, has generally obtained, but has passed because there has been no. opposition to it. It is requisite, if the plaintiff exacts it, that two real persons should become bail.*

But the sheriff stipulating to put in additional bail the motion was waived.

General Rule.

Sat ur BAY-

ORDERED, That on trials, one counsel only, on each side shall examine or cross examine a witness; and that two counsel only on each side shall hum up the evidence to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The practice of inserting only one real person in bail pieces, has generally obtained, but has passed because there has been no. opposition to it. It is requisite, if the plaintiff exacts it, that two real persons should become bail.*

But the sheriff stipulating to put in additional bail the motion was waived.

General Rule.

Sat ur BAY-

ORDERED, That on trials, one counsel only, on each side shall examine or cross examine a witness; and that two counsel only on each side shall hum up the evidence to the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. Cas. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendover-v-ball-nysupct-1796.