Wender & Goldstein, Inc. v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wender & Goldstein, Inc. v. McMahon

242 A.D. 656, 272 N.Y.S. 392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 656 (Wender & Goldstein, Inc. v. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wender & Goldstein, Inc. v. McMahon, 242 A.D. 656, 272 N.Y.S. 392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Westchester county affirming judgment of the Justice’s Court of the town of Searsdale modified so as to provide that the judgment of the Justice’s Court be modified by .striking therefrom the provision for costs and for judgment for defendant on his counterclaim for ten dollars in the event of an appeal; and as so modified the order of the County Court is unanimously affirmed, without costs. There was no authority to render a conditional judgment. We construe the judgment as one in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s claim, and in favor of plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim, without costs to either party. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Westchester county affirming judgment of the Justice’s Court of the town of Searsdale modified so as to provide that the judgment of the Justice’s Court be modified by .striking therefrom the provision for costs and for judgment for defendant on his counterclaim for ten dollars in the event of an appeal; and as so modified the order of the County Court is unanimously affirmed, without costs. There was no authority to render a conditional judgment. We construe the judgment as one in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s claim, and in favor of plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim, without costs to either party. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 656, 272 N.Y.S. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wender-goldstein-inc-v-mcmahon-nyappdiv-1934.