Wendell v. Sleppin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wendell v. Sleppin

5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7073

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 837 (Wendell v. Sleppin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wendell v. Sleppin, 5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an attorney against a former client to recover damages alleged to have been sustained because of the client’s false representation by which the attorney was induced to pay over money held in escrow, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to renew, on additional papers, a motion for a preference. The Special Term denied the motion on the ground that the action was not one entitled to a preference by statute or rule. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursments. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an attorney against a former client to recover damages alleged to have been sustained because of the client’s false representation by which the attorney was induced to pay over money held in escrow, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to renew, on additional papers, a motion for a preference. The Special Term denied the motion on the ground that the action was not one entitled to a preference by statute or rule. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursments. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendell-v-sleppin-nyappdiv-1958.