Wendell Tyler v. Creekside Village Apartments
This text of Wendell Tyler v. Creekside Village Apartments (Wendell Tyler v. Creekside Village Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
VACATE and DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00987-CV
WENDELL TYLER, Appellant V. CREEKSIDE VILLAGE APARTMENTS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03764-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Molberg This is an appeal from the trial court’s final judgment of possession in a
forcible-detainer suit. The judgment was not superseded, and a writ of possession
was served on appellant. Because it appeared appellant was no longer in possession
of the property, and a forcible detainer action generally becomes moot when the
tenant is no longer in possession of the premises, we questioned our jurisdiction over
the appeal. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782,
785, 787 (Tex. 2006) (only issue in forcible detainer action is possession, and issue
becomes moot when tenant vacates property unless tenant has “potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession”); Olley v. HVM, L.L.C., 449
S.W.3d 573, 575 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (appellate
courts lack jurisdiction over moot controversies).
We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the Court’s concern and
noted that, if we determined we lacked jurisdiction, we would set aside the trial
court’s judgment and dismiss the case. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 785, 790 (when
case becomes moot on appeal, appellate court must set aside trial court judgment
and dismiss case). More than ten days have passed and appellant has not filed a
letter brief or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, as it appears
appellant is no longer in possession of the premises, we vacate the trial court’s
judgment and dismiss the case as moot. See id. at 790.
/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
220987F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
WENDELL TYLER, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-22-00987-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03764- A. CREEKSIDE VILLAGE Opinion delivered by Justice APARTMENTS, Appellee Molberg, Justices Reichek and Breedlove participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s final judgment and DISMISS the case.
Judgment entered April 19, 2023.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wendell Tyler v. Creekside Village Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendell-tyler-v-creekside-village-apartments-texapp-2023.