Wendell Reese v. Breckridge Property Fund
This text of Wendell Reese v. Breckridge Property Fund (Wendell Reese v. Breckridge Property Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 23, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00567-CV
WENDELL REESE, Appellant V. BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND 2016, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-01588-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal based on appellant’s failure
to prosecute the appeal and comply with Court directives. As our case management
system reflects, appellant filed the notice of appeal on June 9, 2022 and filed the
required docketing statement on June 22, 2022, see TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. He has
taken no action since. He has failed to pay the Court’s filing fee and fee for the
clerk’s record, although he indicated on the docketing statement that he had not filed
a statement of inability to pay costs, see id. 5, 35.3(a)(2); he has not communicated
with the reporter regarding the reporter’s record and, despite being directed to file
written verification with the Court that he has requested the reporter’s record, has failed to do so, see id. 34.1, 35.3(b)(2); he has not responded to appellee’s motion,
although more than ten days have passed since it was filed; and, he has not otherwise
communicated with the Court.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 provides for the involuntary dismissal
of an appeal based on failure to prosecute or comply with a court order or directive.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, based on appellant’s failure to pay
required fees, comply with a Court directive, and otherwise communicate with the
Court, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c).
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
220567F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
WENDELL REESE, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-22-00567-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-01588- B. BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY Opinion delivered by Chief Justice FUND 2016, LLC, Appellee Burns, Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Wendell Reese.
Judgment entered September 23, 2022
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wendell Reese v. Breckridge Property Fund, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendell-reese-v-breckridge-property-fund-texapp-2022.