Wendell Harris v. Robyn Noble

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 2, 2018
Docket05-18-00324-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Wendell Harris v. Robyn Noble (Wendell Harris v. Robyn Noble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wendell Harris v. Robyn Noble, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 2, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00324-CV

WENDELL HARRIS, Appellant V. ROBYN NOBLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-27608

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Evans Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue.1 By postcard dated May 15, 2018, we notified

appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date,

appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court

regarding the status of this appeal.

1 Appellant filed a docketing statement on March 26, 2018 indicating he had not requested a reporter’s record. Therefore, the deadline for filing appellant’s brief was set for thirty days after the clerk’s record was filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

180324F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WENDELL HARRIS, Appellant On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-00324-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-27608. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. ROBYN NOBLE, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee ROBYN NOBLE recover her costs of this appeal from appellant WENDELL HARRIS.

Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wendell Harris v. Robyn Noble, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendell-harris-v-robyn-noble-texapp-2018.