Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission
757 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 1044
This text of 757 N.W.2d 178 (Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 757 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 1044 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Bruce WENDEL and Anthony Williams, Plaintiffs,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the requests for investigation are currently pending before the Grievance Administrator, who has indicated to the Court that the requests will receive heightened priority. See MCR 9.122(A)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
757 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 1044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendel-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.