Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission
757 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 1044
Opinion
Bruce WENDEL and Anthony Williams, Plaintiffs,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the requests for investigation are currently pending before the Grievance Administrator, who has indicated to the Court that the requests will receive heightened priority. See MCR 9.122(A)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 757 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 1044 (Mich. 2008).
757 N.W.2d 178 (Wendel v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.