Wencel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wencel v. State

737 So. 2d 630, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10086, 1999 WL 543257

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 28, 1999

DocketNo. 98-4110

StatusPublished

This text of 737 So. 2d 630 (Wencel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wencel v. State, 737 So. 2d 630, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10086, 1999 WL 543257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress statements he made [631]*631concerning charges of burglary and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on the authority of Hindenberger v. State, 581 So.2d 633 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), which held that the investigating officer’s attempt to initially establish rapport with defendant prior to giving Miranda warnings did not taint portions of defendant’s statement made after warnings were given.

Similarly, in this case, we cannot conclude that the detective’s initial pre-Mi-randa conversation with appellant involved any coercive or improper police tactics, rendering appellant’s ipost-Miranda confession inadmissable.

WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress statements he made [631]*631concerning charges of burglary and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on the authority of Hindenberger v. State, 581 So.2d 633 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), which held that the investigating officer’s attempt to initially establish rapport with defendant prior to giving Miranda warnings did not taint portions of defendant’s statement made after warnings were given.

Similarly, in this case, we cannot conclude that the detective’s initial pre-Mi-randa conversation with appellant involved any coercive or improper police tactics, rendering appellant’s ipost-Miranda confession inadmissable.

WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 So. 2d 630, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10086, 1999 WL 543257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wencel-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack