Wemple v. Wemple

219 A.D. 241, 219 N.Y.S. 638, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was undoubtedly possible for the plaintiff to procure a judgment for accrued alimony under the Virginia judg[242]*242ment similar to the one in Moore v. Moore (208 N. Y. 97), a failure to comply with which would be punishable as a contempt under section 1172 of the Civil Practice Act. The judgment she did procure for accrued alimony was merely a money judgment. It contained no direction in personam to pay and wholly lacks the provisions of the judgment in the Moore case making the decree of the foreign State the judgment of this court and specifically directing compliance therewith.

For these reasons the order so far as appealed from should be affirmed.

Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskatjer, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wemple v. Wemple, 219 A.D. 241, 219 N.Y.S. 638, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

219 A.D. 241 (Wemple v. Wemple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maltz v. Maltz
279 A.D. 52 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Mitchell v. Mitchell
194 Misc. 73 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Hardy v. Hardy
136 Misc. 759 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)