Wemple v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The defendant appeals from a decree directing the specific performance of an agreement bearing date December 20th, 1935, calling for the transfer of certain judgments for a sum certain to be paid as specified. The amount to be paid was less than the face value of the judgments.
Such a contract, if breached, called for money damages only and is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity to specifically perform. The damages for the breach of such a contract being easily ascertainable and recoverable at law, equitable relief should have been withheld. Curtice Bros. Co. v. Catts, 72 N. J. Eq. 831; Burr v. Bloomsbury, 101 N. J. Eq. 615.
The decree is, therefore, reversed with costs to the end that the bill may be dismissed.
Bor affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Dowges, Heher, Peeskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
8 A.2d 326 (Wemple v. B. F. Goodrich Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.